PharmaDB
Use case · Portfolio & Sourcing Strategy · Spend-Share Leverage Analysis v.04.2026 · refreshed weekly
Use cases Portfolio & Sourcing Strategy Spend-Share Leverage Analysis
Portfolio & Sourcing Strategy Buyer view Molecule · niraparib Data · trade flowsData · internal procurement (optional) Live

Spend-Share Leverage Analysis

Identify the molecules where your spend is concentrated but supplier alternatives are abundant. Procurement leverage, sized.

Free preview · Ask the AI agent any sourcing question
Try
Sign up takes 30 seconds. Your question lands in your first chat.
Example output · spend-share leverage analysis · molecules where the buyer holds the negotiation position
12 Molecules with leverage profile · spend concentration over 30% combined with 10+ alternative active exporters · renegotiation ready
n=12 suppliers · trade warehouse Indicative

Twelve molecules in the warehouse fit the leverage profile in 2024. Niraparib carries seven active exporters and a Top-3 share of 91%, which means the buyer's spend concentrates on three names but ten alternatives exist for qualification. Olaparib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show similar shapes. Each is a category where the procurement team can drive a renegotiation by signalling readiness to redistribute spend across the broader exporter base.

# MoleculeActive exportersTop-3 shareLane HHILeverage
1 Niraparib Oncology · PARP 7 active exporters Top-3 91% NAI
2 Olaparib Oncology · PARP 25 active exporters Top-3 72% NAI
3 Palbociclib Oncology · CDK4/6 9 active exporters Top-3 86% NAI
4 Ribociclib Oncology · CDK4/6 8 active exporters Top-3 88% NAI
5 Abemaciclib Oncology · CDK4/6 15 active exporters Top-3 79% NAI
Leverage candidates
12
Niraparib alternatives
7 active
Median Top-3 share
85%
Median exporter count
11
30 seconds

How it works

molecule losartan origin IN destination BR
01

Pick the portfolio.

Your active sourcing book. Default uses the supply-side spend cube; ERP upload sharpens the spend numbers but is not required.

0 HHI 0.42 1
computed · pre-joined · anonymised
02

The AI agent computes the leverage score.

Spend concentration (your top supplier's share of the category) versus supplier fragmentation (the count of active exporters on the lane). High concentration × broad alternatives equals leverage.

brief · cited
Lane concentration · structurally concentrated
HHI0.42
Top-3 share71%
Actionqualify second source
03

Save the renegotiation brief.

Citation-anchored brief with the leverage candidates ranked, the alternative supplier shortlist per molecule, and a one-click hand-off to the dual-source workflow.

Why a category manager runs it

Negotiation, sized by alternatives.

Two dimensions, one signal.

Spend concentration alone is risk. Spend concentration with abundant alternatives is leverage. The combined score reads the procurement position correctly.

Alternative supplier shortlist.

Each leverage candidate carries a pre-built list of the next-tier suppliers ready to compete on the category. Activates the credible-alternative posture at renewal.

Concentration cap recommendation.

The AI agent recommends a target spend cap per supplier (typically 40-50% of category) to preserve leverage. Above the cap, the category locks in; below, the negotiation stays open.

Renewal-window trigger.

When a major contract is within 90 days of renewal and the molecule sits in the leverage candidate list, the brief fires automatically with the renegotiation pack pre-built.

What a real chat looks like

Type a portfolio. The AI agent returns the leverage map.

A real chat thread in PharmaDB. Type a question, the AI agent runs the tools, the answer lands as a saveable note.

Spend leverage · niraparib + class
chat · saved 2 min ago
You
Surface molecules where my spend is concentrated but the supplier base is broad. Rank by leverage potential and recommend renegotiation priorities.
F
Running tool pharmagraph_query
lane_competitiveness ⋈ company_trade_exports_by_molecule · 12 leverage candidates
F
Twelve molecules carry the leverage profile in the active book. Olaparib leads with 25 active exporters and a Top-3 share of 72%, the cleanest alternatives-rich category. Niraparib has fewer alternatives (seven active exporters) but the Top-3 still holds 91% of share, so the leverage on niraparib runs through qualifying one or two of the long tail. Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show similar mid-tier leverage. The procurement renegotiation pack on each of these molecules opens with the alternative-supplier list and a 40% concentration cap proposal.
Leverage candidates · ranked by alternatives count
1 Olaparib · 25 active Top-3 72% · broad alternatives · clear leverage
2 Abemaciclib · 15 active Top-3 79% · moderate alternatives · medium
3 Palbociclib · 9 active Top-3 86% · thinner alternatives · constrained
+9 more · open in PharmaDB
Cited lane_competitiveness concentration metrics company_trade_exports_by_molecule active exporters per molecule
Ask a follow-up... ⌘ ↵
Time-to-answer

Manual workflow vs. PharmaDB.

Manual workflow
Excel · email · syndicated reports
  1. 01 Pull supplier spend by category 1 day
  2. 02 Cross-reference active exporter universe 1 day
  3. 03 Compute spend concentration 4 hr
  4. 04 Cross-check alternative qualification posture 1 day
  5. 05 Build the renegotiation brief 4-6 hr
Total cycle time 2-3 days per portfolio
PharmaDB
The AI agent · one query · cited
One query.
Pre-joined warehouse. Spend concentration and alternatives count are computed at the schema layer and refresh weekly. The AI agent returns the leverage map ranked and ready for renegotiation review.
Total cycle time Under a minute
Run on your active categories

Leverage candidates across the oncology + DPP-4 books.

Twelve molecules with mid-to-high spend concentration and 5+ alternative exporters · count is active exporters on the molecule's largest lane.

Olaparib deep
25 active exporters
Top-3 72%
Empagliflozin deep
12 active exporters
Top-3 88%
Sitagliptin deep
12 active exporters
Top-3 99%
Apixaban deep
12 active exporters
Top-3 92%
Linagliptin adequate
10 active exporters
Top-3 100%
Abemaciclib deep
15 active exporters
Top-3 79%
Palbociclib adequate
9 active exporters
Top-3 86%
Telmisartan adequate
8 active exporters
Top-3 98%
Ribociclib adequate
8 active exporters
Top-3 88%
Niraparib adequate
7 active exporters
Top-3 91%
Sacubitril adequate
7 active exporters
Top-3 100%
Vortioxetine thin
5 active exporters
Top-3 100%
Thin · < 6 suppliers · qualify additions Adequate · 6–11 Deep · 12+ · negotiable

The leverage analysis is the negotiation playbook on top of the spend cube. PharmaDB joins spend concentration to alternative-supplier count, surfaces categories where leverage exists, and pre-builds the renegotiation brief. The view is lane_competitiveness; the join is to company_trade_exports_by_molecule for the alternatives count.

FAQ

Frequently asked

What is leverage in this context?+

Spend concentration above 30% in a single supplier combined with at least five alternative active exporters on the same lane. The pattern means your spend is concentrated by choice (not by necessity) and a credible threat of redistribution exists.

Why does olaparib show stronger leverage than niraparib?+

Olaparib has 25 active exporters across the lane footprint; niraparib has seven. The alternatives pool is the negotiation lever. More alternatives, more leverage, simpler renegotiation.

How does this connect to the spend cube?+

The spend cube is the static spend inventory. The leverage analysis is the action layer on top: it identifies where the buyer can act on the spend pattern. Both run on the same underlying tables.

Do I need to upload ERP data?+

Not for the leverage signal itself: the supplier-side spend cube and lane HHI give the concentration picture. ERP upload sharpens the buyer-side spend concentration and improves the renegotiation savings estimate.

What if the alternatives pool is thin?+

Concentrated spend with thin alternatives is supplier leverage, not buyer leverage. The brief surfaces it on a separate page (Lane Concentration Risk) and triggers a dual-source qualification workflow rather than a renegotiation.

How fresh is the data?+

Trade aggregates refresh weekly. Leverage metrics recompute on every refresh. The catalog row carries the last-computed timestamp surfaced on every result page.

Run your question.

Bring the molecule, the lane, or the supplier you're sourcing this week. The AI agent runs it on PharmaDB in 30 minutes. You keep the brief.

Book a working session